My personal glimpse into the first half of the 21st Century for some yet to be known future
Wednesday, November 06, 2013
Monday, November 04, 2013
Stupid press and their stupid ways (Facebook haters)
From time to time there are articles claiming the end of Facebook. These articles are all pretty much the same, saying how "kids" are using other social media sites now, such as Vine, Snapchat, Ask.fm, and Instagram. Really?
Vine is not used instead of Facebook. Vine is used instead of Youtube. It's a video app.
Snapchat is only being used for sending sexy videos that cannot be stored. Again, not something that was ever really Facebook's thing. Facebook might be losing some use to Snapchat, but I don't think it's much. Youtube is losing more than Facebook.
Ask.fm is really competition for Reddit and Yahoo! Answers rather than Facebook. Maybe Reddit is stealing time away from Facebook, but ultimately, even these individuals end up on Facebook for social networking (even as they pretend to hate it). Reddit doesn't have a strong social interaction and is mostly just strangers posting for strangers.
What about Instagram? People use Instagram instead of older services like Flickr and Photobucket. It's a photo app. There is a stronger social aspect, but photos aren't really a replacement for communicating on Facebook. It's more like one-way bragging, which ultimately doesn't promote long and engaging interaction. When people respond to someone else's brags, they are trying to make themselves relevant in the context of the braggartry, and that's what tends to happen on Facebook. That's something that just isn't possible on Instagram.
You know what kids are using instead of Facebook? Nothing, ...kinda. They are using text messaging. Texting is why Facebook is seeing a small decline in usage in the younger demographics. Aggressive use of texting is temporary for people, though. Textings doesn't grow as your network grows. There's a certain point where texting becomes intrusive. When that happens, people move their social networking to a more broad service. When they do, that service still tends to be Facebook.
I'm not a Facebook pumper. I can live with or without it. I do know it is the most convenient service right now. There is just something about it that makes it more usable than Google+. Anyone that thinks that Facebook will go the way of Myspace and Friendster just isn't paying attention or only seeing what they want to see. Until something that is actually better comes around, Facebook isn't going to die from a supposed mass migration of its user base.
There is merit to all the services mentioned above. Some services appeal to certain people more than others. Facebook's success is that it is a generalist that covers all the bases.
Vine is not used instead of Facebook. Vine is used instead of Youtube. It's a video app.
Snapchat is only being used for sending sexy videos that cannot be stored. Again, not something that was ever really Facebook's thing. Facebook might be losing some use to Snapchat, but I don't think it's much. Youtube is losing more than Facebook.
Ask.fm is really competition for Reddit and Yahoo! Answers rather than Facebook. Maybe Reddit is stealing time away from Facebook, but ultimately, even these individuals end up on Facebook for social networking (even as they pretend to hate it). Reddit doesn't have a strong social interaction and is mostly just strangers posting for strangers.
What about Instagram? People use Instagram instead of older services like Flickr and Photobucket. It's a photo app. There is a stronger social aspect, but photos aren't really a replacement for communicating on Facebook. It's more like one-way bragging, which ultimately doesn't promote long and engaging interaction. When people respond to someone else's brags, they are trying to make themselves relevant in the context of the braggartry, and that's what tends to happen on Facebook. That's something that just isn't possible on Instagram.
You know what kids are using instead of Facebook? Nothing, ...kinda. They are using text messaging. Texting is why Facebook is seeing a small decline in usage in the younger demographics. Aggressive use of texting is temporary for people, though. Textings doesn't grow as your network grows. There's a certain point where texting becomes intrusive. When that happens, people move their social networking to a more broad service. When they do, that service still tends to be Facebook.
I'm not a Facebook pumper. I can live with or without it. I do know it is the most convenient service right now. There is just something about it that makes it more usable than Google+. Anyone that thinks that Facebook will go the way of Myspace and Friendster just isn't paying attention or only seeing what they want to see. Until something that is actually better comes around, Facebook isn't going to die from a supposed mass migration of its user base.
There is merit to all the services mentioned above. Some services appeal to certain people more than others. Facebook's success is that it is a generalist that covers all the bases.
Friday, November 01, 2013
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Amazon.com's double-whammy for Massachusetts comes in one more day (Nov 1)
Whammy #1
Despite the illegality of applying a state tax (of any kind) to an interstate purchase (in direct violation of U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause found at Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3), Amazon.com has capitulated to Massachusetts' harassment. As of November 1, 2013, Amazon.com will begin collecting the state's sales tax on purchases sold by Amazon.com. This does not include third party vendors which sell their product through Amazon.com's website, who are responsible to handle their own taxation (if any).The problem I have with this is that is really is illegal. Until such a time that Congress actually passes a law granting states the authority to apply their intrastate taxes to interstate sales, these states are in willful violation of our Constitution. There are exceptions this that have been allowed by Federal Courts, but Amazon.com (nor most online retailers) does not have a business that operates in such as way as to fall under these exceptions. Besides that, there are ambiguities that Congress needs to resolve. Allowing taxation of purchases that do not originate within the state may be an open door for states to outright tax purchases that have no origin or destination within their own territory, but are rather just passing through.
There are a lot of nonsensical justifications for taxation of interstate sales, and there are a lot of good reasons to not allow such taxation. I would go into detail here as to why, but I've actually covered this pretty well in a previous article about California's similar attempts to harass Amazon.com and other online retailers.
Whammy #2
Not quit as annoying, but still bothersome is that last week Amazon.com raised their minimum purchase for free shipping. Instead of the $25 threshold, the minimum purchase for free shipping is now $35. What does this mean for most casual shoppers who don't buy into the Amazon Prime plan? There may be some short term gain in sales from customers who are not aware of the change and planned on making immediate purchase. But over the long run, my guess is that many will wait longer between purchases rather that purchase more each time.Saturday, October 12, 2013
Recent trip to Vancouver, BC
I recently visited Vancouver, BC. This photo set on Flickr pretty much tells most of the details of my time off. Here's some views:
Friday, October 04, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)