My personal glimpse into the first half of the 21st Century for some yet to be known future
Friday, April 12, 2013
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
So, there was a slight problem with my room keys at Double Tree yesterday, and this is what I found...
So, there was a slight problem with my room keys at Double Tree yesterday, and this is what I found in my room the afternoon. All #complementary
Tuesday, April 09, 2013
Saturday, April 06, 2013
Remote Stone
Of what world we wonder true? Our lacking nature holds fast our corporeal soul upon the bosom of thriving abodes that guise the cradled womb. In this place stand we, me and all others, bound not in chains but yoked hereto nonetheless. Grand thrusting spears slice through the wondrous blue veil, floating on the currents of bent universe beyond this round realm, bringing to the helm fleshless anthropomorphized cold creatures to cast away the dark cloak, thus revealing remote stone for stone’s sake.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Expose of hate
Wow, it's the 21st Century, and we still have people using the same old tired arguments to justify beliefs that are only marginally covered in some ancient "holy" text. These are the same arguments used by the Nazis to justify hatred of the Jews and other peoples in the early 20th Century, arguments used by Slave Owners to justify slavery in the 19th Century, and arguments used by racist to justify keeping the races separate during the mid-20th Century. How are they using these same bigoted arguments now? ...to attack homosexuals and gay marriage. I ran into a person spewing this nonsense on a social website the other day. Here's a brief rundown of the arguments with my opinions as replies (each one of these could be their own meme):
- Societies that have embraced homosexuality have declined - (Comment: Really? Over-extended borders, reduced/squandered resources, foreign invasions, and heavy debt are all caused by homosexuality?)
- Statistics show us that it's unhealthy to be homosexual - (Comment: What's really the point of this and how is this justification to deny equal protections under the law? It's risky crossing the street. Should we stop equal access to education for those kids that happen to need to cross a street to get to school?)
- God created and defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman - (Comment: Ah, here comes the bible-thumping! Numerous scriptures were quoted at this point. But, how many bible characters had multiple wives? A lot! The bible even sets out rules on how to take captured women from military conquests home as wives.)
- Homosexuals have a higher risk of mental illness - (Comment: Given the fact that homosexuality was classified as a mental illness up until the last part of the 20th Century, I would question any statistics linking mental illness to homosexuality. But on that point, as more scientific facts are discovered, it is becoming increasing understood that most mental illnesses have a genetic factor, which means that being prone to mental illness is also something with which certain individuals are born.)
- STDs, including HIV, higher among homosexuals - (Comment: Teen pregnancy is infinity higher among heterosexuals. Coal miners have much higher risks of lung related diseases. Umm, there's about a million other pointless and dubious statistics that can be pulled out of thin air. All of this is completely unrelated to the fact that we all deserve equal treatment under the law. )
- Societies that had a spread of Christianity had a decline in homosexuality - (Comment: No, homosexuals where just forced into hiding due to the same kind a bigotry being promoted in our time. This is a kin to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's claim that there are no homosexuals in Iran. Complete nonsense.)
- The gay marriage discussion is about changing the religious definition of marriage - (Comment: Again, no. This statement an attempt to re-frame the discussion to pretend that promoting gay marriage rights is an attack on one's own faith, as if gay marriage is somehow violating the rights of unassociated individuals. This is disingenuous at best. The gay marriage rights discussion is about equal protections under the law without regard for what beliefs one group of people have about another group of people.)
- Marriage isn't a human right, but rather an honored institution - (Comment: Talk about grasping for straws! This is a scorched-earth attempt to argue that marriage is just some sort of contract. Well, even with contracts, we are all entitled equal protection under the law. In other words, we are all allowed to enter contracts freely. So, not only does that argument contradict the earlier argument about God defining marriage, it actually makes the opposite point it is trying to make. The point is, we must have equal protection under the law, regardless the circumstances!)
- Gay couples wish to force their beliefs on corporations and the government to take advantage of benefit structures geared for traditional families. (Comment 1: Yeah, again, equal protections under the law is the point. Do we give corporations the right to deny benefits to other classes of families based on religious beliefs? No, because that is supposedly illegal. Comment 2: This statement is a hint about the right of the corporation to have a religious stand. However, a corporation is an imaginary construct of the law. The presuppositional argument is that imaginary things (like corporations) have rights that trump flesh and blood people. Since this person seems to believe that corporations (which are imaginary) have more rights than actual humans, then let's give other imaginary things rights too, like giving the Easter Bunny the right to vote!)
- Married couples pay more taxes. Gay marriage would benefit the government. (Comment: First, "oh the horror of it all! Oh no, the government will benefit from treating people equally!" Second, married couples pay less, the same or more tax based on their family situation. Number of kids, owning a home as a marriage couple, and other factors actually significantly reduce tax liability for families.)
- The point continues: What if our world economy crashes? Labor unions may fall into foreclosure; employers may have to declare bankruptcy and then won't be able to afford the benefit structures that support gay marriage afterwards. (Comment: Really? Argument against equal protections for gays involves what-iffing about world wide catastrophes? Wow! First, the inclusion of labor unions (the reason we have a middle class in American) as "foreclosing" is down right silly, and a very backwards way of expressing one's wishful thinking. I'm not sure how a union would fall into foreclosure, since unions are a free assembly of individuals for the purpose of collective bargaining. The bureaucratic portion of a labor union may go bankrupt, but that doesn't mean the union would cease to exist. A free assembly of individuals certainly cannot be foreclosed upon, as they are actual living and breathing people, not property. Second, collective bargaining is used by employers to provide benefits to their employees. The more employees that are covered, the more economical the benefits. Having gay couples included actually helps reduce costs, not increase them. Third, the idea that gay marriage will worsen a world wide catastrophe is completely ludicrous. Bankers and Wall Street will have far more to do with that than any other minority in our population.)
Much like the average fundamentalist propaganda brochures, the individual who made these points concluded their statements with a bunch of rhetorical questions that they believe they answered in their diatribe. I reserved my sharpest criticism for my own blog here, but I didn't let these bigoted claims go unchallenged on that social forum, nor was I the only one. Another Christian and others also chimed in and called out this individual for those statements.
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Sunday, March 03, 2013
Monday, February 25, 2013
Friday, February 22, 2013
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Senseless Sunday: Antarctica Water Pie
- Antarctica has two species of flowing planets: Antarctic hair grass (Deschampsia antarctica) and Antarctic pearlwort (Colobanthus quitensis).
- Boston Cream Pie is the the official state dessert of Massachusetts. (Go figure.)
- Old trees can actually produce more carbon and methane than they absorb.[1]
- Currently, 400 species of sharks roam on the oceans of Earth.
- The fastest recorded swimming animal is the sailfish, which can swim up to 68 mph.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Tipping point
Wow, there sure has been a lot of back and forth online recently about customary tipping (gratuities) in America for the service provided by waitstaff at restaurants. A lot of it is playing out on Reddit. There was this pastor who protested an 18% automatic tip on a split bill for a large party, citing God has her reason for protest. That event lead to so much buzz that there's no point trying to cover any more it.
Another Reddit posting appeared more recently of another posted receipt. This receipt actually shows a reduction of the automatic tip from the final bill. An interesting backlash has come out of this second posting. Several problems arise. First, the assumption is the automatic tips are some how compulsory. Second, 20% automatic tip is just nuts. I've seen 18%, and I still have to wonder why so high. Third, how can a tip ever be considered compulsory!
I suggest reading the comments of the Reddit links. There are a lot of good statements (some of them even sourced). Legally speaking, tips are not compulsory. By definition (IRS and at the state level), they must be voluntarily offered by the customer in order to qualify as a tip. Sure, a restaurant can charge a service fee, but a service fee is not a tip, and not taxed the same.
Another reason I stopped overtipping is because 15% is now considered a standard tip. Really? I remember when 10% was considered a great tip! And now, some in the restaurant industry are claiming a minimum tip is 25%!? Really?! Waitstaff aren't the only group of people that aren't making a lot of money. Overtipping is making it harder for average Americans to go out and enjoy dinner. That actually hurts our overall economy. Less people will dine out, consume less when they do dine out, or dine out a places without a waitstaff. This means less overall money finding its way into the full service restaurant industry.
And, just as important. Do not tip on the whole bill. Tipping is on the subtotal. Sales tax is what we pay to the local government. You really want to tax your sales tax? People who pay their tip on the sales tax portion of the bill may think they are being good people, but this is just another form of overtipping.
Now, the flipside of this is that there are many areas of the restaurant that are not under the control of the waitstaff. Judge a tip based on the service itself. For example, if a steak comes cooked incorrectly, it's a 50% chance that the waitstaffer got the order wrong. However, it is 50% chance that the kitchen got it wrong too. Give the waitstaffer the benefit of the doubt.
Another Reddit posting appeared more recently of another posted receipt. This receipt actually shows a reduction of the automatic tip from the final bill. An interesting backlash has come out of this second posting. Several problems arise. First, the assumption is the automatic tips are some how compulsory. Second, 20% automatic tip is just nuts. I've seen 18%, and I still have to wonder why so high. Third, how can a tip ever be considered compulsory!
I suggest reading the comments of the Reddit links. There are a lot of good statements (some of them even sourced). Legally speaking, tips are not compulsory. By definition (IRS and at the state level), they must be voluntarily offered by the customer in order to qualify as a tip. Sure, a restaurant can charge a service fee, but a service fee is not a tip, and not taxed the same.
Overtipping is creating a monster
There's a general issue at the heart of all this: overtipping. There has been way too much overtipping since the late 1990's. People feel good about themselves when they overtip. This is pure arrogance and selfaffirmation. I know, I used to be one of those overtippers. Why did I stop overtipping? Sure, it helps the one individual, but it hurts the overall system. The more overtipping occurs, the more waitstaff come to expect the higher tip rate, regardless to the level of service. Bad servers are rewarded for being bad. The value of good servers is diminished over time. Plus, waitstaff often don't connect the dots well enough to understand why they are getting a good tip and why they are not. I was taught this lesson a very long time ago by a friend of mine who was a former waitress. It took me a very long time to accept it.Another reason I stopped overtipping is because 15% is now considered a standard tip. Really? I remember when 10% was considered a great tip! And now, some in the restaurant industry are claiming a minimum tip is 25%!? Really?! Waitstaff aren't the only group of people that aren't making a lot of money. Overtipping is making it harder for average Americans to go out and enjoy dinner. That actually hurts our overall economy. Less people will dine out, consume less when they do dine out, or dine out a places without a waitstaff. This means less overall money finding its way into the full service restaurant industry.
No more overtipping
Can I afford to overtip? Yes. But I've stopped doing it after realizing the harm it is causing to the overall system. Since 15% is now the normal and legally recognized tip, I consider that to be the minimum for normal/good service. I will often push the tip up for great service. However, that rarely exceeds 18%, and is usually 16-17%.And, just as important. Do not tip on the whole bill. Tipping is on the subtotal. Sales tax is what we pay to the local government. You really want to tax your sales tax? People who pay their tip on the sales tax portion of the bill may think they are being good people, but this is just another form of overtipping.
How to handle bad service
If service was so-so, I normally just ignore it and move on. What I have learned, that if service is particularly bad, do not take it out of the tip (or at least, don't wait to take it out of the tip). Depending on the degree of the problem, talk to the restaurant staff about the issues you are experiencing. For extremely minor issues, I will say, just get over it. For simple matters that need to be addressed, talk to the waitstaff. They should be able to take care of the matter. I've found that waitstaff will often forward bigger issues to the Manager without you asking. If the waitstaff isn't helpful or the problems are bigger, then ask for the Manager. Again, depending on the degree of the service problem, you may wish to wait until after the meal. Some waitstaffers will resent you for complaining. If it is a problem that must be addressed before the end of the meal, then if at all possible, wait until the food arrives.Region
Having travelled much of America now, I've found that some areas are just better than others when it comes to the quality of service. Set your expectations accordingly. Of course, it is still not OK to receive rude service. However, I've found that coastal regions of California tend to have better service on the average than other areas, such as Massachusetts. Many times, trying to get your waitstaffer's attention can be a bit of a chore at many places in Massachusetts. Training seems to be biggest cause for issues in Massachusetts, since normally the waitstaffers are willing to serve, they just aren't always as aware on how to be attentive.Don't punish waitstaff for kitchen and systematic problems
Now, the flipside of this is that there are many areas of the restaurant that are not under the control of the waitstaff. Judge a tip based on the service itself. For example, if a steak comes cooked incorrectly, it's a 50% chance that the waitstaffer got the order wrong. However, it is 50% chance that the kitchen got it wrong too. Give the waitstaffer the benefit of the doubt.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)