Sunday, July 19, 2015
Saturday, July 18, 2015
Friday, July 17, 2015
Thursday, July 16, 2015
Friday, July 10, 2015
Thursday, July 09, 2015
Significantly higher rate of foodborne illness and death in cities with plastic bag bans
We find that the San Francisco County ban is associated with a 46 percent increase in deaths from foodborne illnesses.
The study not only links deaths to the plastic bag ban, but also the additional costs of illness for those who get sick, but do not die. What is the reason for more people getting sick? The study claims it is because we are reusing our reusable shopping bags without cleaning them between uses!
The study goes on to point out that similar increases in illnesses from foodborne diseases have been seen in other communities that have since also banned plastic bags.
Ick!
I pointed out this potential problem about six years ago in my Tuesday Two/Epoch-Fail series, where I stated,
And what of reusable canvas bags? Heh. Guess what. You have to buy them. They get very unsanitary very quickly. Wanna guess how many patrons are not washing them regularly? There are reasons behind our strict food handling guidelines, and canvas bags now represent a very weak link in food safety
The Grocery Bag Bans and Foodborne Illness study isn't perfect, but it does coincide with my statements. However, it's not just about keeping bags washed. The study finds that we store the reusable bags in places that tend to breed bacteria, such as car trunks.
The study also points out that the overall cost of the ban doesn't come close to breaking even with the benefit seen to the environment as a result of the ban. In other words, the cost of plastic bag bans is substantially greater than the cost benefit to the environment!
The problem is that we have local governments making rules about society without proper research in vain attempts at social engineering. Before the plastic bag bans went into effect, these governments should've found and implemented safe alternatives. It's been eights years since that original ban, and we still do not have safe alternatives even being proposed! What we do have is more cities and counties pushing for expansion of the ban, despite the harm it causes us and the lack of actual benefit to the environment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)