My personal glimpse into the first half of the 21st Century for some yet to be known future
Thursday, July 29, 2004
very Very brief complaint about comparing Superman to Spider-man movies
If special effects of Superman were put on par to the 2000's, then a modern equivalent to Superman would be X-Men, as both have average special effects for their time, and both are plot driven stories of similar depth.
IMO, the Spider-man movies are easily the best comic book movies ever made. They have excellent production quality, good to great acting, awesome action, well developed characters (the ones we care about), etc. It's a refreshing reminder that movies (even an action-flicks) shouldn't be non-stop action when handling characters that the audience cares about; and that a balance can be reached between plot and character development.
Superman, X-Men, first couple Bat Man movies are a tier lower. They are still great movies, but they do lack the story telling of the Spider-man series. Just watch the first two Superman movies again. Although they have similar plots to Spider-man, they are pretty flat when held up to the two Spider-man movies.
Monday, July 26, 2004
"Bring me back something French!"
Friday, July 23, 2004
Reviewing the Movie Reviewers
One thang I’ve been noticing about movie reviewers in widely distributed periodicals is that they happily show-off what little they happen to know. The most recent example of this is the review by J.M. in the Wall Street Journal. He reviewed the Borne Supremacy. He starts off with glowing statements about the movie. Then he starts comparing it to the director’s previous movie, Bloody Sunday. Bloody Sunday is a political film about how British Soldiers started shooting N. Irelanders. So, J.M. compares a political docu-drama with a big budget action flick, simply because both are directed by the same person. Huh? So, I’m guessing that J.M. did see that little non-Hollywood film? Or maybe he did just five minutes of research on the internet, found some reviews that said it was good and then decided to make his review another big-budget-soul-movies-have-no-soul article. Is something wrong with a film just because it has a high budget and is from Hollywood? Review the damn movie you are talking about, J.M.! If you must compare, then pick movies from the same genre, and compare apples to apples.
I can just imagine if J.M. was around when 2001: A Space Odyssey came out. J.M. might say something like “Although this is a wonderful, technically accurate film, I find it is missing the creepiness Kubrick so cleverly weaved into the classic Lolita. This is what happens when talent like Kubrick gets a big Hollywood budget. I sure wish they made more movies about perverts instead of science fiction. Kubrick has failed his fans.” I just have one thang to say to you, J.M, “Get real.”
Thursday, July 22, 2004
Here's the truck after it rolled off the overpass and into the freeway exit. Maybe the fire burned through the brake lines, sending this huge truck rolling off the road and through the trees and brush. My coworkers had just finished passing through this exit when the truck started falling behind them.
Copyright © 2004 Matthew Lorono
I'm Sailing, I'M SAAILLING
Tuesday, July 20, 2004
Four Problems with California Politics
Item 1: There are too many laws which mandate spending. This creates two problems. Well over 50% of the California budget is locked up by these laws that prevents the legislature and governor from putting money were it is needed on a yearly basis. Second, they create government spending that cannot be eliminated. We need to not pass any more mandated-spending bills, and scale back on such laws already on the books.
Item 2: We have this ridiculous requirement for a 2/3rds supermajority vote on the budget each year. This is a democracy, where the majority rules, but the rights of the minority are protected. How is a supermajority vote requirement for something as mundane as the yearly budget supposed to do either? When used on something mundane as the yearly budget, supermajority actually allows a very small number of powerful legislature members to mandate their own personal desires onto the entire body. Supermajorities should be reserved for when they are most useful, as in cases of political crisis (impeachment) or changing winds (changes to the constitution). To use them for anything else is antidemocratic! We need to get rid of the supermajority vote requirement for the state budget.
Item 3: Term limits in the state legislature is leaving our leadership in shambles. Any experienced members are lame ducks, and the rest are rookies. There's no accountability because no one is around long enough to care! Originally, term limits was supposed to help minorities and women get into government, but now it is having the opposite effect. We need to get rid of term limits.
Item 4: Single-minded religious centric people and cooperate egomaniacs have a stranglehold on the Republican Party in California. This has hampered its ability to put up electable members to the legislature. Coupled with term limits, this has created a scenario where the Democratic Party has an unnatural majority at the state level. The Republican Party needs to put more socially and secularly minded conservatives or moderates up for election. Again, term limits would also need to go. These two actions would hopefully bring more balance back to the legislature.
If Californians took these bold steps to correct the problems mentioned here, I feel the state would have much few budge crises and we'd have more resources to tackle older problems that just keep getting worse, such as the detoriation of our public school system, fire departments, road system and other urban infrastructure.
Tuesday, July 13, 2004
Bumble Bees and Cows
(a saying I came up with over ten years ago)
Monday, July 12, 2004
So, why do I recycle?
Ok, so I actually attempted to save my aluminum cans. I've been saving them for 3 years now. You might think, "Man, that's a lot of cans." Not really. I had only 4 kitchen garbage bags full. The first problem I encountered is that it is not easy to find recycling centers. Where the hell are they? I found one by accident last month, so today I brought my cans to it. The place was closed in the middle of the morning on a Monday. So I came back at lunch. Finally, I was able to offload these cans...for the tremendous sum of...16.54 (including a few plastic bottles). 3 years worth of saving netted me an amount that is substantially lower than my hourly income. Yeah, so tell me again why I'm supposed to recycle?
Saturday, July 10, 2004
Paintballin'
Friday, July 09, 2004
Weekends special ...ahhh
Tuesday, July 06, 2004
Errands and Bank Hours
There was a time when banks had dreadful hours. I think it was something like 10am to 2pm. Then it was a big deal when they started staying open til 4pm. Then it was a big deal for a bank to be open on Sat. Now, they are open from 9 or 10am til 5pm everyday, 6pm on Fridays, and 10am to 1 or 2pm on Sat. Even with all of these changes, their hours still suck. At least banks have made an effort to be available during some of the time that the average person has a free time.