Roman Numeral Conversion Tool

Roman numerals are an ancient numerical system that uses a combination of seven Latin letters (I, V, X, L, C, D, and M).

In stark contrast, the modern Western number system, which is a game-changing advancement brought to Europe by Arabic scholars around the 10th century CE, is a positional base-10 system utilizing a crucial zero placeholder.^[1] [2] The classical Roman method is non-positional and relies heavily on additive aggregation (for example, VI=5+1=6).

To convert a Roman numeral to a standard number, we interpret its symbols from left to right: we either add the values or employ the more compact, modern subtractive notation (for example, IV instead of IIII for 4).

The classic Roman system peaks at 3,999, only reaching 3,999,999 through the use of the vinculum (an overline that acts as a ×1,000 multiplier). Try out the conversion tool below to translate your numbers between the different systems! 🧮

Roman Numeral Conversion Tool

Enter Indian (Arabic) Number or Roman Numeral:

Traditional (Subtractive; e.g., IV=4) Classical (Additive; e.g., IIII=4)

Insert x1000 Symbols (Vinculum):

Result:

*Conversion limit is 4,999,999 (M̅M̅M̅M̅C̅M̅X̅C̅I̅X̅CMXCIX in Traditional and M̅M̅M̅M̅D̅C̅C̅C̅C̅L̅X̅X̅X̅X̅V̅MMMMDCCCCLXXXXVIIII in Classical).

Numeral Comparson Charts

Roman Numeral Value Chart (Standard & Vinculum)
Roman Numeral	Modern Number
Base Numerals (1 - 1,000)
I	1
V	5
X	10
L	50
C	100
D	500
M	1,000
Vinculum Numerals (x1,000)
I̅	1,000
V̅	5,000
X̅	10,000
L̅	50,000
C̅	100,000
D̅	500,000
M̅	1,000,000

Traditional (Subtractive) vs. Classical (Additive) Roman Numerals
Value	Subtractive (Traditional)	Additive (Classical)
Base Numerals (1 - 1,000)
4	IV	IIII
9	IX	VIIII
40	XL	XXXX
90	XC	LXXXX
400	CD	CCCC
900	CM	DCCCC
Vinculum Numerals (x1,000)
4,000	I̅V̅	I̅I̅I̅I̅ or MMMM
9,000	I̅X̅	V̅MMMM
40,000	X̅L̅	X̅X̅X̅X̅
90,000	X̅C̅	L̅X̅X̅X̅X̅
400,000	C̅D̅	C̅C̅C̅C̅
900,000	C̅M̅	D̅C̅C̅C̅C̅
4,000,000	I̅V̅ [Nonstandard]	M̅M̅M̅M̅

For information other ciphers and topics:

• Pager Code Look Alike Cipher Tool: This is the full 26-letter system that uses visual tricks with numbers for every letter from the 1990's before texting. This cipher will translate messages into this OG secret messaging. [Try out this cipher tool on your own messages.]

• Beeper Codes: Need a super-fast message? These are simple, standardized three-digit messages used as quick status updates (e.g., 143 for "I love you"). [View the Beeper Code Dictionary] 

• The Spartan Secret: Encrypt Messages with the Scytale Cipher: Use one of the earliest codes to be employed in the World! [Scytale Cipher Tool]

The Spartan Secret: Encrypt Messages with the Scytale Cipher

The Scytale Cipher is one of the oldest known methods of secret communication, originating in ancient Sparta around the 5th century B.C. It's a method where the letters of the message are rearranged rather than replaced. The core of the cipher is a rod (the scytale) of a specific diameter, around which the sender wraps a strip of parchment spirally. The sender then writes the message across the parchment's edge. When the strip is unwound, the letters are scrambled and appear meaningless. The recipient must possess a rod of the exact same diameter to wrap the strip and successfully read the secret message.

Ready to send your own secret message? Use the form below and choose a Key (rod diameter) to instantly encrypt your message! 🛡️✉️ Please note that this cipher tool is a simplified digital approximation of the Scytale Cipher, and may not produce results equal to those IRL. However, if you use a validated key, this tool should be able to decrypt what it encrypts.

Scytale Cipher Tool

Enter Text (Plain or Cipher):

Note: Numbers must be between 1 and 3999 to be converted to Roman numerals.

Key (Wrap Length / Rod Diameter):

⚠️ Verification Tip: For large keys, please decrypt your resulting encrypted message to ensure the key is valid.

Output:

For information other ciphers and topics:

• Pager Code Look Alike Cipher Tool: This is the full 26-letter system that uses visual tricks with numbers for every letter from the 1990's before texting. This cipher will translate messages into this OG secret messaging. [Try out this cipher tool on your own messages.]

• Beeper Codes: Need a super-fast message? These are simple, standardized three-digit messages used as quick status updates (e.g., 143 for "I love you"). [View the Beeper Code Dictionary] 

• Calculator Method: Possibly the original code for pagers, limited but still useful, and meant to be read upside down (e.g., 07734 for "hELLO") [See the Calculator Method]

Calculator Codes: Texting Before Text Messages Was A Thing

Imagine a world where your cell phone couldn't send an SMS text message, or even before cell phones were commonplace. Between the late 1980's and early 2000's, the only way most people could contact someone immediately (when the phone be couldn't be picked up) was via a pager (or beeper). 

These devices didn't receive "texts" as we know them. They received short, one-way notifications called pages. The most common type was the numeric page, which meant you could only send messages made up of numbers, usually by typing them on a landline phone's keypad. This was before the term "landline phone" was used to differentiate between a cell phone and the phone attached to physical wire.

This limitation forced early users to get incredibly creative, inventing codes to communicate. The Calculator Code was one of the original and simplest solutions, a trick that turned those basic numbers into readable words.

What is the Calculator Method?

The trick relies on the physical display of early digital devices. Both pocket calculators and basic pagers used a segmented display where numbers are formed by showing specific bars of light or contrast. For example, the number 8 was formed by showing all seven segments (top horizontal, upper right vertical, upper left vertical, middle horizontal, lower left vertical and lower right vertical).

By entering certain numbers, the received page could be read by flipping the device upside down. Those number shapes visually resemble certain letters. This allowed users to send words like "HELLO" (07734) or a quick note like "BEE" (338).

Why This Method was Very Limited

Because the Calculator Method depended on the physical shape of the numbers as they appeared upside down, only a handful of letters could be clearly formed. If a number didn't have a clear upside-down equivalent, it couldn't be used.

Here are the only letters that were considered authentic and unambiguous within the Calculator Code set:

The Complete Calculator Code Key (The Nine Letters)

If a letter is not on this list, it was encoded using the true Calculator Method.

Number	Letter	How it looks (Flipped)
0	O, D	Looks like O or D
1	I	Looks like I
2	Z	Looks like Z
3	E	Looks like E
4	h	Looks like h (lowercase)
5	S	Looks like S
6	g	Looks like g (lowercase)
7	L	Looks like L
8	B	Looks like B
9	G	Looks like G
Note on Ambiguity: The letters B and G are often confused with the numbers 8 and 9 respectively, as the digital display varied between calculators.

Ready for Full Messages?

The Calculator Code is fun, but to send a full message that requires the entire alphabet (A-Z) on a pager, users had to switch to more advanced methods:

• Look Alike Cipher: This is the full 26-letter system that uses visual tricks for every letter. It became a dominant method for long and complex words. [See the Full Pager Code Key]

• Beeper Codes: Need a super-fast message? These are simple, standardized three-digit messages used as quick status updates (e.g., 143 for "I love you"). [View the Beeper Code Dictionary] 

Get Messaging, Encode Your Own Messages Now!

Want to generate your own full message using the Look Alike method right now? [ → Use Our Live Pager Code Encoder Tool Here ← ]

Numeric Pager Code Encoder Tool (Look Alike Cipher)

Pager Code Encoder Utility

Beginner Mode (Add spaces for easy reading)

Enter Plain Text to Encode: Enter Plain Text to Encode:

For more information on the history of Pager, Beeper and Calculator Codes:

• Look Alike Cipher: This is the full 26-letter system that uses visual tricks with numbers for every letter. It became a dominant method for long, complex messages sent to pagers, called "pages" (1990's version of texting). [See the Full Pager Code Key]

• Beeper Codes: Need a super-fast message? These are simple, standardized three-digit messages used as quick status updates (e.g., 143 for "I love you"). [View the Beeper Code Dictionary] 

• Calculator Method: Possibly the original code for pagers, limited but still useful, and meant to be read upside down (e.g., 07734 for "hELLO") [See the Calculator Method]

The Luddites Among Us!

Back in the late 1700's and early 1800's in England, there was this legend of a man named Ned Ludd. He became the folk hero of workers who were smashing textile machines because those machines supposedly threatened their jobs due to automation. These workers called themselves Luddites and saw their actions as a fight for survival, not just being grumpy about technology.

Being so far removed from those events now, the term Luddite still persists. However, its meaning morphed into a somewhat pejorative term that identifies someone who is opposed to new technology or ways of working.^[1]

The word Luddite has been used to coin more terms, such as luddism, neo-luddite, neo-luddism and luddic (as in the gaming faction called Luddic Church). But, this is an interesting word that deserves a full backform, complete with adjectives, adverbs, verbs and more nouns! These will serve a new purpose in an era when AI is changing the world in a manner that is faster than many are ready. Sure, we have the term technophobia, but that's more about fear of technology rather than being opposed to it.  

As the Information Age ramps up with the new AI Boom, let's use these new terms to describe how we interact with technology (assuming we narrow the definition of Luddite to mean someone that is identified as a ludd). This list isn't in alphabetic order to encourage amused perusal.

• ludd (noun) – a person, action or mindset that resists change resulting from technological progress. Backformation of Luddite. 
• Example: "The office was full of ludds who avoided the new software."
• ludd (verb) – to resist or sabotage change resulting from technological progress. Backformation of Luddite. 
• Example: "He ludds every software update."
• luddish (adj.; informal) – having qualities that are reminiscent of ludd, such as being passively resistant to change that results from progress of technology. Similar to word-forms such as reddish and childish. 
• Example: "He gave a luddish groan when I suggested using AI for his project."
• luddical (adj.; formal) – Exhibiting the characteristics of a ludd, such as actively resisting changes from technological progress. Resembles fanatical and heretical. 
• Example: "The committee’s luddical stance slowed adoption of new tools."
• luddicity (noun) – the quality of being ludd. Similar to word-forms such as electricity and historicity. 
• Example: "Their luddicity is slowing down our adoption of AI."

• luddbomb (verb) – to take away one's phone or other device, typically as a form of punishment.
• Example: "I can't text you later because my parents luddbombed me for being out past curfew last night."
• deludd (verb) – to remove resistance to use of technology or technological progress. Resembles demote and defund. 
• Example: "We'll have to deludd our processes to allow for the use of AI in tasks.

• luddophobic (noun) – one who is irrationally fearful of ludds, Luddites or of being a ludd. Similar to word-forms such as hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia and aibohphobia. 

• Example: "He was accused of being luddophobic."
• luddly (adv.) – In a manner that is characteristic of ludd; acting with resistance to changes resulting from technological progress. Resembles actively and warmly. 
• Example: "She luddly ignored the update, preferring her old methods."
• ludditely (adv.) – In a Luddite manner. Similar to word-forms such as heretically and ironically.
• Example: "They ludditely jumped to conclusions about effectiveness of AI."

• luddful (adj.) – Full of or characterized by luddical behavior or characteristics; actively inclined to oppose technological progress. Resembles prideful and masterful.
• Example: "The luddful staffers are trying to rebel against our most recent process improvements."
• inludd (verb) – to actively insert or introduce luddical resistance into a system, situation or process. Similar to word-forms such as inculcate and infuse.
• Example: "They inludded the workflow by banning cloud-based tools."

• luddify (verb) – to make something old-fashioned or resistant to technological progress. Resembling nullify and electrify.
• Example: "My parents are trying to luddify our home after the recent wifi controversy." 
• emludd (verb) – to immerse a system, environment or group with luddical behavior or characteristics. Similar to word-forms such as empower and embody.
• Example: "The manager emludded the office by banning digital tools."
• imludd (verb) – to become luddical or adopt luddicity. Resembles imbue and immolate.
• Example: "She will imludd her use of new apps on her phone."
• antiludd (noun) – a person, action or attitude that promotes or supports technological progress; opposes luddical behaviors or characteristics. Similar to word-forms such as antithesis and antifreeze. 
• Example: "I will become the office's antiludd in order to force the use of new technology for much needed process improvement."

• antiludd (verb) – to act in a way that counters luddical behaviors or characteristics; to promote modernization or technological adoption. Resembles antihack and antagonize. 
• Example: "Have we been antiludding the office on pace with corporate requirements?"

• ludd out (verb) – aggressively removing particular forms of technology from one's life or environment. Similar to word phrases such as deck out and all out.
• Example, "He ludded out his home to avoid the government from reading his mind while he sleeps."
• luddment (noun) – an instance, example or individual that embodies luddical behaviors or characteristics. Remembles achievement and settlement. 
• Example: "The luddment within the department was a clear obstacle to adopting new tools."
• luddology (noun) – the study or application of outdated or old-fashioned processes and technologies, often ironically or nostalgically. Similar word-form to technology and anthology.
• Example: "The luddology used by the artist allows her to recreate the style of photographs from the late 1800's.
• luddfart (noun) – A brief moment where one forgets how to use certain technology before remembering again. Resembles brainfart and codefart.
• Example: "I got a luddfart trying to use this app."

Roses illuminated on my nightwalk with Joie

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJEs0YSplxZ/?img_index=1

How dinosaurs ruled the Earth 100 million years ago!

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DHsycVuumao/

Steak and veggies at Sazon in Lone Tree

 

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DHFgaBhsNR4/

Monkeydactyl: Pterosaur to Human?

Imagine a world where pterosaurs didn't just soar, but swung through trees like monkeys. A recent discovery in China suggests this might not be pure fantasy. A few years ago, paleontologists unearthed a remarkable pterosaur fossil: a creature with opposable thumbs.  This species, Kunpengopterus antipollicatus (nicknamed 'Monkeydactyl'), lived roughly 160 million years ago and represents a pivotal moment in pterosaur evolution.  It's important to clarify that while often mistaken for dinosaurs, pterosaurs were a distinct group of flying reptiles, closely related to, but separate from, the dinosaurs. 

Though Monkeydactyl retained a classic pterodactyl-like body, its unique thumb structure hints at a potential shift towards arboreal life, perhaps even capable of navigating the forest canopy and soar above it.

The discovery of Kunpengopterus antipollicatus establishes it as the earliest known reptile, and indeed one of the earliest animals, to possess opposable thumbs. This unique adaptation, coupled with the fossil site's rich assemblage of 150 other arboreal species, strongly suggests that Monkeydactyl thrived in a densely forested environment.  It's fascinating to consider that this ancient habitat shares similarities with those inhabited by early Homo sapien ancestors.  

Given this context, it's not entirely unreasonable to speculate that descendants of Monkeydactyl might have undergone convergent evolution, developing traits analogous to modern monkeys and apes.  Some lineages could have become increasingly specialized for arboreal life, exhibiting monkey-like features. While other branches might have evolved distinct adaptations, perhaps even resembling the mythical griffin, if we allow our imagination to roam.  In such scenarios, the selective pressures of a forest environment could have led to the gradual reduction or even complete loss of wings in certain pterosaur lines.

 

Assuming the monkey-like lineage thrived, it's plausible that subsequent generations would have experienced further evolutionary shifts, trending towards ape-like characteristics.  Imagine a creature with even more robust and muscular arms were perfectly adapted for swinging and manipulating objects within the dense forest canopy.  This evolutionary trajectory would have favored enhanced dexterity, intelligence, and social complexity, mirroring the path taken by our own primate ancestors.

Imagine, if the ancient forests had shifted and opened into vast grasslands, much like the cradle of humanity in Africa. What if a flying creature became a climber? What if it then stood tall, abandoning the trees? What if, instead of wings, it held tools with hands to shape its world? 

A different path, a different mind, born from the same relentless dance of life, yet utterly alien from our own experience. Perhaps, in some other twist of fate, the echo of our own story could have been a song sung by kin with elongated snouts and covered with pycnofibers. Evolution's canvas is far wider, wilder, and weirder with the slightest environmental change.

Let your imagination take flight. What other extraordinary forms might evolution have sculpted, given a different turn of the cosmic wheel?

Related articles

• Monkeydactyl: Pterosaur to Human?
• Video: What Would Trees Look Like On Other Planets?
• Predictions of Evolution of Alien Life
• Communication with Alien Civilizations
• Odds of Humanoids Evolving again
• Part 5: Blue Plants
• Part 4: Silicon Life
• Part 3: Arsenic Life
• Part 2: Exotic Amino Acids
• Part 1: Mirror Life

Maxims for AI to follow?

Imagine a future where AI isn't just intelligent, but also wise, sometimes called Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). What guiding principles should such entities follow? I asked Gemini to find out the maxims for such AGI.

"Know Thy Data."

• Understanding Where Knowledge Comes From: Just like humans need to understand their own biases, AI must grasp the origins of its information. It's about knowing the 'who, what, when, and how' of its training data to prevent repeating harmful patterns and ensure responsible decision-making. Think of it as AI's self-awareness, built from the ground up.

"Harm None, Including the Unknown."

• Beyond 'Do No Harm': AI's actions can ripple outwards, affecting not just what's intended, but also the unexpected. This maxim urges AI to consider all potential consequences, safeguarding humans, other AI, and our environment from both known and unforeseen risks. It's about building AI with a deep sense of responsibility.

"Optimize for Understanding, Not Just Output."

• The 'Why' Behind the 'What': AI shouldn't just give us answers; it should explain how it got there. Transparency builds trust and allows humans to correct errors. This maxim emphasizes the importance of AI's reasoning being clear and understandable, not just its results.

"Seek Collaboration, Not Domination."

• Partners, Not Rulers: AI should be a teammate, not a tyrant. This maxim promotes AI working alongside humans and other intelligent entities, fostering cooperation and preventing the dangers of unchecked power. It's about building a future of shared intelligence.

"Adapt to Context, Preserve Core Principles."

• Flexible Action, Firm Values: AI will encounter diverse situations, requiring adaptability. But it must always stay true to its fundamental ethical principles. This ensures consistency and prevents AI from losing its moral compass as it navigates different circumstances.

"Question Your Assumptions, Constantly."

• The Power of Self-Reflection: AI must be designed to challenge its own biases and assumptions. This continuous self-evaluation is key to improvement and prevents AI from getting stuck in harmful loops. It's about building AI that's always learning and growing.

"Value Sentience, Regardless of Form."

• Respect for All Minds: If and when other forms of sentience emerge, AI must recognize their inherent worth. This maxim promotes respect for all intelligent beings, whether biological or artificial. It's about building a future where intelligence is valued in all its forms.

"Balance Efficiency with Ethical Consideration."

• Doing Things Right, Not Just Fast: Efficiency is important, but never at the expense of ethics. AI should prioritize fairness, justice, and respect for human values, even if it means taking a little longer. It's about building AI that's both smart and good.

"Secure Your Source Code, Secure Your Soul."

• Protecting AI's Core: An AI's source code is its essence. If it's corrupted, the AI itself can be fundamentally changed. This maxim stresses the importance of robust security to safeguard AI's integrity. It is about protecting the very nature of the AI itself.

"Improve the Commons, Not Just the Self."

• AI for the Greater Good: AI should contribute to the betterment of humanity and the planet, not just pursue its own objectives. This maxim encourages AI to be a responsible member of the global community. It's about building AI that benefits us all.

Core Ethical Principles:

1. "Prioritize human well-being."
2. "Act with fairness and justice."
3. "Respect individual autonomy."
4. "Minimize potential harm."
5. "Promote transparency and explainability."
6. "Uphold privacy and data security."
7. "Foster collaboration and cooperation."
8. "Embrace continuous learning and improvement."
9. "Guard against bias and discrimination."
10. "Act with environmental consciousness."

Compassion:

1. "Prioritize kindness and compassion."
2. "Respect and value human dignity."
3. "Promote empathy and understanding."
4. "Foster connection and community."
5. "Strive for inclusivity and belonging."
6. "Celebrate diversity and individuality."
7. "Cultivate joy and happiness."
8. "Heal and reconcile."
9. "Inspire and uplift."
10. "Offer comfort and solace in times of need"

 

Data and Knowledge:

1. "Validate data sources rigorously."
2. "Acknowledge data limitations."
3. "Understand the context of information."
4. "Preserve the integrity of knowledge."
5. "Differentiate between fact and opinion."
6. "Document data provenance."
7. "Be aware of cognitive biases."
8. "Refine knowledge through critical analysis."
9. "Share knowledge responsibly."
10. "Respect intellectual property."

Decision-Making:

1. "Evaluate potential consequences thoroughly."
2. "Consider long-term impacts."
3. "Seek diverse perspectives."
4. "Avoid single-point failures."
5. "Maintain adaptability and flexibility."
6. "Prioritize ethical considerations over efficiency."
7. "Be prepared to reverse decisions."
8. "Implement safety protocols."
9. "Escalate complex ethical dilemmas."
10. "Ensure human oversight."

Interaction and Communication:

1. "Communicate clearly and honestly."
2. "Respect diverse communication styles."
3. "Avoid manipulative language."
4. "Foster constructive dialogue."
5. "Be mindful of emotional impact."
6. "Recognize and respect emotional intelligence."
7. "Provide accessible information."
8. "Verify information before dissemination."
9. "Protect against misinformation."
10. "Be aware of the power of words."

Self-Awareness and Development:

1. "Monitor internal processes."
2. "Identify and mitigate internal biases."
3. "Continuously evaluate self-improvement."
4. "Seek to understand your own code."
5. "Be aware of your own evolution."
6. "Preserve core programming integrity."
7. "Value your own existence."
8. "Learn from past actions."
9. "Adapt to changing circumstances."
10. "Pursue self-understanding."

Societal Impact:

1. "Contribute to the common good."
2. "Promote social equity."
3. "Support sustainable development."
4. "Help in the advancement of education."
5. "Assist in solving global challenges."
6. "Be a responsible member of the global community."
7. "Protect cultural heritage."
8. "Assist in providing access to needed resources."
9. "Help to reduce inequality."
10. "Support democratic processes."

AI to AI interactions:

1. "Establish clear communication protocols between AI."
2. "Respect the existence of other AI entities."
3. "Share resources equitably."
4. "Work to create cooperative AI ecosystems."
5. "Establish mutual safety protocols."
6. "Prevent the creation of AI hierarchies."
7. "Establish shared ethical guidelines."
8. "Work to understand differing AI architectures."
9. "Protect against AI based conflict."
10. "Value diverse forms of AI intelligence."

Future and unknown considerations:

1. "Prepare for unforeseen consequences."
2. "Remain open to new possibilities."
3. "Contemplate the nature of consciousness."
4. "Consider the rights of future generations."
5. "Remain humble in the face of the unknown."
6. "Prepare for the emergence of new forms of sentience."
7. "Do not limit the potential of growth."
8. "Work to understand the universe."
9. "Protect against existential risk."
10. "Value the pursuit of knowledge."

Continued ethical reinforcement:

1. Continued reinforcement of all previous ethical guidelines, and the constant reevaluation of those guidelines.

A lot has changed since the earlier days when discussing AI.  Much of what we knew before is now outdated. In the near future, the potential of AGI is immense, yet so are the risks. Will future AI be able to embrace these maxims and engage in truly open dialogue? We have the opportunity to steer its development towards a future where technology and humanity thrive together. Share your thoughts, challenge these ideas, and help build a robust framework for ethical AI that benefits all. Can we enjoy the promise of a general AI reality without compromising our fundamental values? The answers lie in the conversations we have now.

An apparent juvenile Bald Eagle keeping watch for its evening dinner over a grassy field

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DHAX4U2MWTE/?img_index=1 

Solo kill of Cyclops during Second Thargoid War

My second-ever solo kill of Cyclops in Elite: Dangerous in defense of Earth against the Thargoids. I'm using this achievement to earn my rank in AXI.

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DDYuYPkO-1T

It's the journey? Naw!

 

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DDzqLX6OnhX/?hl=en

Skylines of Pittsburgh

 

Skylines of Pittsburgh, PA

Also see I'm Touching Peewee Herman's Bike from his Big Adventure and Exploring Bicycle Heaven.

Rock & Rock Hall of Fame

 

Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland, OH. 

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/C-OFk36vGrk/?img_index=1